What should a good web design proposal include?
A good web design proposal includes nine sections: the goal in the agency's words, its approach, a line-item scope, explicit exclusions, copy ownership, the named team, process and revisions, a milestone schedule, and the price with terms. If any of those are missing, ask for them in writing before you compare prices.
This is a buyer-side web design proposal template. Instead of helping agencies write proposals, it shows you what to look for in one, with notes on what strong proposals do and weak ones miss. If you haven't asked for proposals yet, start with our website redesign RFP template, which tells agencies exactly what to send back.
The annotated web design proposal template
Here are the nine sections in the order a good proposal usually follows, with what a strong version looks like and the gap to watch for in a weak one.
Section | A strong proposal | A weak proposal |
|---|---|---|
1. Goal | Restates your problem and success measure specifically | Generic paragraph about digital presence |
2. Approach | What they'd do first and what they'd question | A list of services they offer |
3. Scope | Pages, templates, CMS collections, integrations, line by line | Website design and development |
4. Exclusions | Written list: copy, migration, photography, hosting | Missing entirely |
5. Copy | Who writes each page, from what inputs, when | Not mentioned, or content to be supplied |
6. Team | Named people, roles and your main contact | Our talented team |
7. Process | Phases, review points, rounds per phase, what counts as a round | Unlimited revisions or nothing at all |
8. Schedule | Milestones with client dependencies | A launch date with no dependencies |
9. Price and terms | Fixed price or clear range, payment schedule, ownership | Estimate subject to change |
Use the table as a checklist. Score each proposal section by section, then compare totals. Our agency evaluation scorecard turns this into a weighted score you can share with co-founders.
What do weak proposals usually leave out?
Weak proposals usually leave out exclusions, copy ownership and the delivery team. Those three omissions don't look like problems on day one. They become problems in week four, when someone asks who's writing the pricing page or why the senior designer from the pitch hasn't appeared.
- Exclusions. If nothing is excluded, everything is ambiguous. Ask what's not included.
- Copy. Several landing-page cost sources note that two quotes can differ tenfold depending on whether strategy and writing are included. A proposal that's silent on copy is almost always assuming you'll supply it. Our guide to website copywriting cost explains how to compare.
- Team. Ask who designs, who writes and who builds, by name.
- Revision definition. Unlimited revisions sounds generous and usually means slow, undefined rounds.
- Post-launch. What happens if something breaks a week after launch?
What red flags should you look for in a web design proposal?
The biggest red flags in a web design proposal are vagueness where you need precision and precision where you need flexibility. A proposal that's vague on scope but fixed on a launch date with no dependencies is setting up a dispute.
Pros
- Restates your goal in specific terms
- Challenges at least one assumption in your brief
- Names the people doing the work
- Lists exclusions and how change orders are priced
- Shows relevant live work and explains the agency's role in it
Cons
- Could be sent to any client with the name changed
- Price is an estimate subject to change with no ceiling
- Copy, CMS setup or QA isn't mentioned
- Unlimited revisions with no definition of a round
- Asks for full payment up front on a large project
One more check: does the proposal fit your platform needs? If it recommends a platform, it should say why for your team specifically, such as who edits the site after launch. If you're moving platforms, see our guide to hiring a Webflow or Framer migration agency and the migration quote checklist.
How do you compare several web design proposals?
Compare web design proposals by scoring the same sections, in the same order, before you look at price. Then normalize the scope: if one proposal includes copy and another doesn't, add a realistic copy cost to the second before comparing totals.
Build one comparison table
Rows for each of the nine sections, a column for each agency.
Normalize scope
Add the cost of anything one proposal excludes that another includes, such as copywriting or CMS setup.
Score quality before price
Rate approach, team and process first. Reveal or weigh price last.
Ask each finalist one hard question
For example, what would you cut if the budget dropped by a third? Their answer shows how they think.
Check one reference each
Ask a past client what went wrong and how the agency handled it.
For example, suppose two proposals arrive for the same 6-page site
Hypothetical example: proposal A is lower and lists design and build of 6 pages. Proposal B is higher and lists a messaging brief, copy for all 6 pages, design, CMS setup with two collections, QA on named browsers, and launch support.
Once you add a copywriter, CMS setup and QA to proposal A, the totals are close, and proposal B has one accountable team instead of three. Neither is automatically better, but you can only see that after normalizing scope.
What does a Designify proposal look like?
A Designify proposal is short because our prices are fixed and published. A website is $8,000 for up to 6 pages, +$500 per extra page, with copywriting, custom design, CMS and a Next.js build. A landing page is $6,000. A brand & design sprint is $3,000. The rest of the proposal covers approach, scope, team and process, with delivery timelines scoped on the intro call.
We always say who writes the copy, because one small in-house team writes, designs and builds. We also say who we're not for. If you need a large stakeholder program, a different kind of firm will serve you better, and our list of website agencies for early-stage startups under $10k is a place to compare. Once you've picked a proposal, lock it into a line-item statement of work.
