How do you decide whether to migrate your website?
Decide by asking whether the platform itself is causing the problem you want to fix. If it is, and the gain outweighs the cost and SEO risk of moving, migrate. If the real problem is your messaging, design, speed or plan choice, fix that in place, because a new platform won't solve it.
Most teams arrive at the question backwards. Someone sees a competitor's site, a price email lands from the platform, or a developer says the stack is dated, and the conversation jumps straight to which platform to move to. This guide slows that down. It gives you a scorecard across five factors (cost, team, content, integrations and SEO risk) and a clear threshold for each outcome, including the one most agencies won't suggest: don't migrate.
We build on Framer, Webflow and Next.js, so we don't have a platform to sell you. That's the lens for everything below.
Should I migrate my website, or is the problem somewhere else?
Start by naming the symptom, because each one points to a different fix. A platform move fixes workflow, content-structure and integration problems. It rarely fixes conversion or messaging problems on its own.
Symptom | Most likely cause | First fix to try | Read next |
|---|---|---|---|
Site doesn't convert | Copy and offer | Rewrite the homepage and key pages | |
Site looks dated | Design | Redesign on the current platform | |
Pages are slow | Build quality | Optimize images, scripts and fonts | |
Bill went up | Plan fit | Audit seats, plan and usage | |
Marketers wait on developers | Platform and workflow | Consider a visual builder | Score the factors below |
CMS can't model your content | Platform | Consider a platform with a richer CMS | Score the factors below |
Site must share auth or data with the app | Platform | Consider code, often Next.js | Score the factors below |
If your symptom sits in the top four rows, try the first fix before scoring anything. If it sits in the bottom three, the platform may well be the cause, and the scorecard will tell you whether it's worth moving.
How does the website migration scorecard work?
The scorecard has five factors. Four measure how much your current platform is hurting you, each scored 0, 1 or 2. The fifth measures how much you could lose by moving, also scored 0 to 2, and it's subtracted. The result is a net score from -2 to 8.
Factor | 0 points | 1 point | 2 points |
|---|---|---|---|
Cost | Bill is fine or fixable by changing plan | Bill is rising and only partly fixable | Bill is unsustainable after optimizing |
Team | Edits are quick and nobody is blocked | Some changes need a specialist | Most changes queue behind one person |
Content | CMS fits what you publish | Workarounds for some content | Content you need can't be modeled |
Integrations | Everything connects | Some tools need hacks | A must-have integration is impossible |
SEO risk (subtract) | Little search traffic at stake | Some pages rank and bring leads | Search is a main lead source |
Score honestly, and score the platform, not the build. A badly built site on a good platform can feel exactly like a bad platform. If a skilled rebuild on the same platform would fix the issue, score it as 0.
How do you score each factor?
Score each factor against evidence, not frustration. For each one, there's a question that cuts through opinion.
Cost: what would you pay after optimizing?
Score cost on the bill you'd pay after removing unused seats, extra sites and add-ons, not the bill you get today. Pricing really is driving switches right now: Webflow's seat and bandwidth changes, its May 2026 plan merge described by Brix Templates, and Framer's per-locale localization fees have all pushed teams to look around. But many teams find an optimized plan closes most of the gap. Our guide to handling a platform price increase walks through the break-even math.
Team: who is blocked, and how often?
Count the last ten site changes and how many needed someone other than the person who asked. If marketers routinely wait days for a developer to change a headline, that's a 2. If one change in ten needed help, it's a 0.
Content: can the CMS model what you publish?
List the content types you publish or plan to publish in the next year: posts, case studies, integrations, locations, comparison pages, docs. Score 2 only if a type you need can't be modeled without duplicating pages by hand.
Integrations: is anything impossible, or just awkward?
Awkward integrations score 1; impossible ones score 2. Shared auth with your app, server-side logic or a CRM sync the platform can't support are real 2s. A form that needs a webhook is a 0.
SEO risk: what's at stake if rankings dip?
Look at the share of leads that come from organic search and how many pages earn them. A site where search drives a large part of the pipeline scores 2. Risk can be managed with redirects and checks, but it never drops to nothing.
What do the scores mean?
The net score points to one of three outcomes. The lowest band, don't migrate, is the one teams are most surprised by and the one that most often turns out to be right.
Net score | Outcome | What to do |
|---|---|---|
-2 to 2 | Don't migrate | Fix copy, design, speed or plan on the current platform |
3 to 5 | Fix first, then reassess | Make the in-place fixes, rescore in a quarter, and plan the move only if the score holds |
6 to 8 | Migrate | Plan the move with a URL map, redirects, QA and a quiet launch window |
Hypothetical example: scoring two very different sites
For example, suppose a Series A SaaS company on Webflow is unhappy with its site. Cost scores 1 (the bill rose but plan changes help), team 0 (marketers edit freely), content 0, integrations 0, and SEO risk 2 because search drives many demos. The net score is -1: don't migrate. The real issue turns out to be an unclear homepage, so the team rewrites it.
Now suppose a seed-stage AI startup on Wix. Cost 1, team 2 (only the founder can edit without breaking layouts), content 2 (it needs filterable use-case pages), integrations 2 (signup must create app accounts), and SEO risk 0. The net score is 7: migrate, and plan it properly.
When is don't migrate the right answer?
Don't migrate when the score is low, when timing is bad, or when the motive is a single irritation. A move costs money, attention and some SEO risk, and it should buy something specific that you can't get by fixing what you have.
- You're mid-launch or mid-raise. A migration competes for the same attention. See when not to migrate your website.
- The problem is the words. A new platform with the same copy converts the same way.
- The problem is speed. Most slow builder sites are slow because of images, scripts and fonts. Fix it in place first.
- The motive is price alone. Optimize the plan, then compare the saving to the migration cost.
- A vendor promises zero risk. Every move carries some. Our list of migration red flags helps you spot overpromising.
What should you do if the score says migrate?
Plan the move as a project with an owner, a URL map and a launch window. Every move between builders is a manual rebuild; no converter exists for Webflow to Framer, Wix to anything, or Framer to code. That means the work is predictable, but it has to be done carefully.
Pick a quiet window
Avoid launches, fundraising and your busiest sales season. See the best time to migrate.
Decide on redesign scope
Choose whether to redesign during the move. Our guide to migrating and redesigning at once covers the trade-off.
Audit content
Keep, merge or retire every page based on traffic, links and relevance.
Build the URL map
Map every old URL to a new one and plan 301 redirects for anything that changes.
Get comparable quotes
Use a checklist so proposals cover the same scope. See what a migration proposal should include.
Launch and monitor
Switch at a quiet time, then watch indexing, rankings, forms and analytics for several weeks.
If you're moving off a hosted builder, our hub on outgrowing Wix, Squarespace or GoDaddy covers each route. If you're choosing a partner, see how to choose a migration agency.
How much does a migration cost compared with fixing in place?
A migration almost always costs more than fixing in place, because it includes a rebuild plus SEO and QA work. Agency quotes we see for migrations typically run from $1,500 to $25,000 depending on size, and they vary by team. In-place fixes such as a copy rewrite, a homepage redesign or a speed pass usually cost a fraction of that.
The cost that surprises teams isn't the build. AI coding agents have made rebuilds much faster; cursor.com was reportedly rebuilt in three days for about $260 in model usage. The real cost remains URL mapping, redirects, metadata and QA, which still need a person. For a full breakdown, see website migration cost by platform.
For reference, our fixed prices: a brand and design sprint is $3,000, a landing page is $6,000, and a website is $8,000 for up to six pages plus $500 per extra page. Migration work is scoped on the intro call, and we include redirects and SEO checks in any migration we take on.
What related decisions should you make at the same time?
A migration is a natural moment to settle other site-wide decisions, because you're touching every page anyway. Make them deliberately, or not at all, rather than letting them creep in mid-project.
- Rebrand or not. If a rebrand is coming within a year, sequence it with the move. See rebranding and redesigning at the same time.
- Company name. A name change means a domain change, which is a bigger SEO event than a platform change. Our name change decision framework helps.
- AI crawler readiness. Decide how you'll handle AI crawlers and whether an llms.txt file is worth adding.
- Content cuts. Retiring pages is cheaper during a move than after it.
What should you read next?
The articles in this cluster each go deeper on one outcome of the framework. Start with the one that matches your symptom.
If you're asking | Read |
|---|---|
Is now a bad time to move? | |
Is it design or platform? | |
Our bill went up. Now what? | |
Why doesn't the site convert? | |
Can we just make it faster? | |
Is this vendor overpromising? | |
When should we schedule it? |
